Posts Tagged comparison

Spring, Samsung, Google and WinMo

I use Sprint for my cellular service like many other Americans. It’s reliable, it’s fairly inexpensive, it has an unlimited data plan and, well it works (I won’t mention friends and colleagues who love their fruit machines, but can never get them to work due to the network, but alas that’s another story). When I initially signed up for service I thought I’d try something new, something different. For that, I opted for the Samsung Moment:

samsung moment

pretty sleek device, had a QWERTY keyboard and overall looked and felt nice. Over time it had some issues (airplane mode, upgrading from 1.5 to 2.1, being s-l-o-w and sometimes non-responsive) but nothing too drastic that the ole IT cure all (turn it off and back on again) couldn’t fix.

Well, with TechEd Berlin coming up, I’ve got to go to Berlin to speak which means going overseas. Sprint for those of you who don’t know run on a CDMA network and 99% of their phones are CDMA. What does this mean? Well, it means that their phones won’t work overseas, so there goes the moment out the window. So, being a Microsoft MVP and one who is always sticking up for their technology and software I pushed out the boat and had them issue me an Intrepid:

Search-Bing-via-Voice-on-Samsung-Intrepid-2

Runs Windows Mobile 6.5 and so far, not too bad. Now that I’ve got the history out of the way, here is the intent of the article. The Moment versus the Intrepid or essentially Android versus Windows Mobile.

Andriod

At first I wasn’t sure I’d like it as Google makes you log in to the device and their primary goal no matter what anyone says is that they want to track you and use your information to their advantage. It’s their business model. So, no gmail account, no phone services (or limited ones at that). However, once that was past, it was a pretty streamlined experience. I can’t say it was perfect but it was good. The default OS seemed to work ok, it had functionality and worked pretty well. However, I never ended up getting a full day’s battery out of the phone at normal use and I can only equate that to the OS.

As for the breadth of applications, not too shabby, however this is where they need some work. The Android Marketplace is at best a Moroccan Bazaar. No quality control, no real information, just put your app up here and we’ll help tout it to the Androidians (that’s my new name for those who use Android).

Windows Mobile

After the first few days of having the Intrepid, I found it pretty straightforward and easy to use, however I missed the bigger screen. The keypad on the Intrepid wasn’t as nice either, but that’s not really an OS drawback/feature, but it’s noticeable. Now, back to the OS. I will say Google seemed to trump Windows Mobile 6.5 here as when I click the start menu on my Windows Mobile I get some strange fandangled layout of applications which reminds me of some tetris like game on Xbox. You can’t rearrange them, you can’t ABC order them, you can only send to top and hope for the best. Mail however works a treat and the battery life allows me to have a full day of work on the phone without needing to reach for my charger. The Windows Marketplace too seems much more streamlined and groomed compared to that of the Android Market, however my concern with the WM Marketplace is pre-requisite checking. Bing has an app that requires special resolution, however it doesn’t say that anywhere and not until after I downloaded it and the .cab tried to install itself did it error out telling me I had an incompatible device. These kinds of things should be checked prior to download or even better yet WinMo, don’t show me them if my device is uncapable.

Summary

In short (I know I didn’t do too much comparison, but I like to keep these articles below 1000 words), they’re both good solid devices. I will say I feel more productive with my Intrepid Windows Mobile device but knew I had more “fun” options with my Moment. I have a full days battery life with the WinMo, but had more of the community behind the apps on the Android. All in all, if Windows Phone 7 Series is more crafted and well refined these two players, Android and Windows Mobile could easily take back some of the market that Apple has had the stronghold on for some time now and the competitionwill only make the devices strive for betterdom in the long run.

Tags: , ,

Yet another reason why Hyper-V (or SCVMM) is better than VMware

Today I got called to a client’s site who recently moved from premises A to premises B.  This meant they turned off their VMware ESX 3.0 server for the first time in a while.  When they relocated they couldn’t authenticate nor could they get to their file/print server.  A quick analysis showed a few things:

  • New building = New IP scheme (ugh)
  • Upon logging in to the ESX web portal, the two servers were still off

Noting this, no worries, in the web portal, lets start them up.  Easy and straightforward.  Now, here’s the kicker.  I wanted to remote control the servers via the console or via the VI client (to look at potentially changing IP addresses or find out what the old scheme was and change it to match/overllap the new scheme)…Wrong move.

The server first told me I had a non-supported browser.  I was using IE 8 (as it is standard with Windows 7).  Ok, no problem, as an IT Pro, I’ve also got other options…Firefox 3.5.7…nope not supported either.  Opera?  Guess what, no go.  Ok, so let’s download the VI Client and do it that way.  Downloaded no problem but when starting it, the woes began again:

only on 32 bit

Thanks VMware.  Your client only works on 32 bit architectures.  So that means most IT professionals who have more than 3 GB of memory can’t use your client?  Oh, one other thing, nice UAC prompt:

contact your admin

Program name: Contact: Your local administrator

OK, so my rant now done, why does this upset me?  Well, Hyper-V can be managed:

  • locally on 32 or 64 bit with RSAT
  • remotely with RDP
  • in just about any browser using SCVMM

Yet another reason why I think I’m going to be sticking with Hyper-V.

NOTE: Yes, I know there are ways around installing the 32 bit client on a 64 bit OS, but I didn’t want to, nor did I have the time, to pull apart the installer with an MSI builder and have it bypass the OS checks.  That’s not my job and that’s not why customers pay VMware loads of money for their software – OH, payment…that’s right Hyper-V is FREE too and it has this functionality in built :)

Tags: , , , , , ,